Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

evil-winrm: Update gems to fix rexml vulnerability #392400

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 23, 2025

Conversation

guylamar2006
Copy link
Contributor

@guylamar2006 guylamar2006 commented Mar 23, 2025

Update gems to fix rexml vulnerability "CVE-2024-49761"

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@guylamar2006
Copy link
Contributor Author

nixpkgs-review result

Generated using nixpkgs-review.

Command: nixpkgs-review pr 392400


x86_64-linux

✅ 1 package built:
  • evil-winrm

@SuperSandro2000 SuperSandro2000 merged commit 5210fb7 into NixOS:master Mar 23, 2025
56 of 59 checks passed
@guylamar2006 guylamar2006 deleted the update-evil-winrm branch March 23, 2025 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants