Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tshock: init at 5.2.3 #392463

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

tshock: init at 5.2.3 #392463

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ProggerX
Copy link
Member

@ProggerX ProggerX commented Mar 23, 2025

Resolves #391648

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@ProggerX ProggerX force-pushed the add-tshock branch 2 times, most recently from 68e360e to 66182fa Compare March 23, 2025 18:03
@ProggerX
Copy link
Member Author

So... That's it

@ProggerX ProggerX requested a review from Aleksanaa March 24, 2025 05:02
@ProggerX ProggerX added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label Mar 24, 2025
@TymanWasTaken
Copy link

Tested this locally and it seems to run properly, I can generate a world and run & join the server locally just fine. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Package request: tshock
3 participants