xrock: init at 1.1.2

[felixsinger]

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[felixsinger]

Tested that xrock works.

[ethancedwards8]

Otherwise LGTM. Nice work.

[felixsinger]

@NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot merge

[nixpkgs-merge-bot]

@felixsinger merge not permitted (#305350):
R-Ryantm Maintainer merge: pr author is not r-ryantm
CommitterPR: pr author is not committer

[orangecms]

A really nice tool, good to have! 🥳

How is it with udev rules? The AUR package installs them:
https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=xrock

no idea what the mechanism would be in Nix though

[felixsinger]

A really nice tool, good to have! 🥳

How is it with udev rules? The AUR package installs them: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=xrock

no idea what the mechanism would be in Nix though

Will add udev rules in a dedicated pull request. They are not strictly required and the tool works with root as expected.