Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify T-LoRa-Pager device PID #11194

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2025
Merged

Modify T-LoRa-Pager device PID #11194

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 31, 2025

Conversation

lewisxhe
Copy link
Contributor

Sorry, there was a small misunderstanding.
espressif/usb-pids#231

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 28, 2025

Warnings
⚠️

Some issues found for the commit messages in this PR:

  • the commit message "Modify T-LoRa-Pager device PID":
    • summary looks empty
    • type/action looks empty

Please fix these commit messages - here are some basic tips:

  • follow Conventional Commits style
  • correct format of commit message should be: <type/action>(<scope/component>): <summary>, for example fix(esp32): Fixed startup timeout issue
  • allowed types are: change,ci,docs,feat,fix,refactor,remove,revert,test
  • sufficiently descriptive message summary should be between 10 to 72 characters and start with upper case letter
  • avoid Jira references in commit messages (unavailable/irrelevant for our customers)

TIP: Install pre-commit hooks and run this check when committing (uses the Conventional Precommit Linter).

👋 Hello lewisxhe, we appreciate your contribution to this project!


📘 Please review the project's Contributions Guide for key guidelines on code, documentation, testing, and more.

🖊️ Please also make sure you have read and signed the Contributor License Agreement for this project.

Click to see more instructions ...


This automated output is generated by the PR linter DangerJS, which checks if your Pull Request meets the project's requirements and helps you fix potential issues.

DangerJS is triggered with each push event to a Pull Request and modify the contents of this comment.

Please consider the following:
- Danger mainly focuses on the PR structure and formatting and can't understand the meaning behind your code or changes.
- Danger is not a substitute for human code reviews; it's still important to request a code review from your colleagues.
- Resolve all warnings (⚠️ ) before requesting a review from human reviewers - they will appreciate it.
- To manually retry these Danger checks, please navigate to the Actions tab and re-run last Danger workflow.

Review and merge process you can expect ...


We do welcome contributions in the form of bug reports, feature requests and pull requests.

1. An internal issue has been created for the PR, we assign it to the relevant engineer.
2. They review the PR and either approve it or ask you for changes or clarifications.
3. Once the GitHub PR is approved we do the final review, collect approvals from core owners and make sure all the automated tests are passing.
- At this point we may do some adjustments to the proposed change, or extend it by adding tests or documentation.
4. If the change is approved and passes the tests it is merged into the default branch.

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against e56af91

Copy link
Member

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please be careful next time, as we just released 3.2.0 with the wrong PID.

@lewisxhe
Copy link
Contributor Author

OK, thanks

@P-R-O-C-H-Y P-R-O-C-H-Y added Type: 3rd party Boards Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged labels Mar 28, 2025
@me-no-dev me-no-dev merged commit 7b0298b into espressif:master Mar 31, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Pending Merge Pull Request is ready to be merged Type: 3rd party Boards
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants