Skip to content

docs: remove outdated FAQ on shadowed declaration warning #6487

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 1, 2025

Conversation

anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor

Resolves none.

Description

What is the purpose of this pull request?

This pull request:

  • Removes the outdated FAQ related to the shadowed declaration warning in C files

Related Issues

Does this pull request have any related issues?

This pull request:

  • resolves none

Questions

Any questions for reviewers of this pull request?

No.

Other

Any other information relevant to this pull request? This may include screenshots, references, and/or implementation notes.

No.

Checklist

Please ensure the following tasks are completed before submitting this pull request.


@stdlib-js/reviewers

---
type: pre_commit_static_analysis_report
description: Results of running static analysis checks when committing changes.
report:
  - task: lint_filenames
    status: passed
  - task: lint_editorconfig
    status: passed
  - task: lint_markdown
    status: passed
  - task: lint_package_json
    status: na
  - task: lint_repl_help
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_cli
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_javascript_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_python
    status: na
  - task: lint_r
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_src
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_examples
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_benchmarks
    status: na
  - task: lint_c_tests_fixtures
    status: na
  - task: lint_shell
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_declarations
    status: na
  - task: lint_typescript_tests
    status: na
  - task: lint_license_headers
    status: passed
---
@stdlib-bot stdlib-bot added the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Apr 1, 2025
@anandkaranubc
Copy link
Contributor Author

Given the context in which the FAQ was posed, it can be safely removed, right? @kgryte

@anandkaranubc anandkaranubc added the Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation. label Apr 1, 2025
@kgryte kgryte removed the Needs Review A pull request which needs code review. label Apr 1, 2025
@kgryte kgryte merged commit b3d21c0 into stdlib-js:develop Apr 1, 2025
46 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Documentation Improvements, additions, or changes to documentation.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants