Skip to content

For TSUP, we also type-check with no-emit #233

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
May 21, 2025
Merged

Conversation

heyitsaamir
Copy link
Contributor

@heyitsaamir heyitsaamir commented May 16, 2025

TS obscures type errors, so we shouldn't rely on it solely for type-checking.

egoist/tsup#609

@heyitsaamir heyitsaamir requested a review from a team as a code owner May 16, 2025 17:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@corinagum corinagum left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What is the decision for when to use tsup and tsc?

@heyitsaamir
Copy link
Contributor Author

What is the decision for when to use tsup and tsc?

TSUP when it might also get used in client, tsc for anything server only.

I don't know if there's very many things that require tsup tbh. @aacebo i can only think of like 2 libraries that would use it right? ACs, and Teamsjs

@heyitsaamir heyitsaamir merged commit a474a0a into main May 21, 2025
7 checks passed
@heyitsaamir heyitsaamir deleted the aamirj/tscemitwithtsup branch May 21, 2025 03:33
heyitsaamir added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
heyitsaamir added a commit that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants