Skip to content

bring CI up to tooling standard for the arduinoOTA repo #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
ubidefeo opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #7, #9, #20, #23 or #24
Closed

bring CI up to tooling standard for the arduinoOTA repo #8

ubidefeo opened this issue Oct 1, 2021 · 5 comments · Fixed by #7, #9, #20, #23 or #24
Assignees
Labels
criticality: medium Of moderate impact status: in progress Work is in progress on this topic: documentation Related to documentation for the project topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement

Comments

@ubidefeo
Copy link

ubidefeo commented Oct 1, 2021

This tool requires proper documentation (README.md) and an up-to-standard CI and standard labelling workflows.
Please @per1234, can you setup things for it?
thank you

@ubidefeo ubidefeo added the priority: medium Resolution is a medium priority label Oct 1, 2021
@ubidefeo
Copy link
Author

ubidefeo commented Oct 1, 2021

please @per1234
can you provide an initial README.md for this repo?
thank you

@per1234
Copy link
Contributor

per1234 commented Oct 1, 2021

standard labelling workflows

Provided by #7 ✔️

@per1234 per1234 added status: in progress Work is in progress on this topic: documentation Related to documentation for the project topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement labels Oct 1, 2021
@umbynos umbynos removed their assignment Oct 4, 2021
@per1234
Copy link
Contributor

per1234 commented Oct 12, 2021

Readme:
#10

@rsora
Copy link

rsora commented Oct 18, 2021

Is this done @per1234 ?

@per1234
Copy link
Contributor

per1234 commented Oct 18, 2021

There are a couple of standardized workflows that depend on the project being managed as a Go module:

It's not currently a Go module, so I didn't apply those on the first pass. I think it would be good to do though.

It would also be nice to set up a tester build generation workflow similar to this one:
https://github.com/arduino/tooling-project-assets/blob/main/workflow-templates/publish-go-tester-task.md
and perhaps a release workflow as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
criticality: medium Of moderate impact status: in progress Work is in progress on this topic: documentation Related to documentation for the project topic: infrastructure Related to project infrastructure type: enhancement Proposed improvement
Projects
None yet
4 participants