Skip to content

Split repository's CI workflow into functional parts. #3

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020
Merged

Split repository's CI workflow into functional parts. #3

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 10, 2020

Conversation

per1234
Copy link
Collaborator

@per1234 per1234 commented Sep 10, 2020

In the experimental repository the action was migrated from, the system was to have a single workflow for each action hosted in the repository.

Although it is a sensible approach in that context, it meant combining things that are only loosely related into a single workflow. Now that the action has a dedicated repository, it makes sense to split it into multiple workflows:

  • Testing
  • Linting

In the experimental repository the action was migrated from, the system was to have a single workflow for each action hosted in the repository.

Although it is a sensible approach in that context, it meant combining things that are only loosely related into a single workflow. Now that the action has a dedicated repository, it makes sense to split it into multiple workflows.
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #3 into main will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #3   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            2         2           
  Lines         1555      1555           
=========================================
  Hits          1555      1555           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ef24872...f4649e1. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Contributor

@aentinger aentinger left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes total sense 👍 Thank you @per1234 🚀

@aentinger aentinger merged commit 2b78b1e into arduino:main Sep 10, 2020
@per1234 per1234 deleted the split-ci branch September 10, 2020 11:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants