-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45.9k
fix(backend): mask Authorization header in web request block #10035
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs-dev canceled.
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
✅ Deploy Preview for auto-gpt-docs canceled.
|
This pull request has conflicts with the base branch, please resolve those so we can evaluate the pull request. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi! I'm a grad student working on a research project about using large language models to automate code review. Based on your commit cd10ab4 and the changes in autogpt_platform/backend/backend/blocks/http.py, my tool generated this comment:
- Handle the case where
input_data.headers
can beNone
to avoid potentialTypeError
. -
- Ensure that
input_data.headers
is always a valid dictionary to prevent runtime errors.
- Ensure that
-
- Validate that
input_data.method
is notNone
before being used in the request.
- Validate that
-
- Ensure that
input_data.url
is notNone
or an empty string before making the request.
- Ensure that
-
- Validate that the
body
field is of an expected type (e.g., dict for JSON) before processing it.
- Validate that the
-
- Ensure that sensitive information is not included in error messages.
-
- Sanitize the content of the response before returning or logging it to avoid leaking sensitive information.
-
- Ensure that sensitive data in requests or responses is not logged or is masked appropriately.
-
- Implement validation on the
url
andmethod
fields in theInput
class to prevent SSRF attacks.
- Implement validation on the
-
- Ensure that
input_data.headers
is a dictionary and notNone
.
- Ensure that
-
- Ensure that
response
is notNone
before accessingresponse.content
.
- Ensure that
-
- Ensure that
input_data.body
is of an expected type before parsing it as JSON.
- Ensure that
-
- Ensure that
input_data.authorization.get_secret_value()
is called only ifinput_data.authorization
is notNone
.
- Ensure that
-
- Ensure that the
SecretStr
type from Pydantic is being used correctly for theauthorization
field in theInput
class.
- Ensure that the
-
- Ensure that
get_secret_value()
is a valid method ofSecretStr
.
- Ensure that
-
- Ensure that the
logger
used inlogger.warning(error_msg)
is defined and imported properly.
- Ensure that the
-
- Ensure that
SchemaField
is properly imported or defined in the code.
- Ensure that
-
- Ensure that the default value for
json_format
aligns with the expected behavior of the function and is documented clearly.
- Ensure that the default value for
-
- Consider using a more descriptive name like
request_headers
for the variableheaders
to clarify its purpose.
- Consider using a more descriptive name like
-
- Ensure that you are using the latest version of the
requests
library to avoid known vulnerabilities.
- Ensure that you are using the latest version of the
-
- It is generally better to catch specific exceptions unless there is a compelling reason to catch all exceptions.
-
- Add a test case to verify that when the
authorization
field is set, theAuthorization
header is correctly included in the request.
- Add a test case to verify that when the
-
- Add a test case to ensure that if the
authorization
field isNone
, theAuthorization
header is not included in the request headers.
- Add a test case to ensure that if the
-
- Ensure that the new import statement for
SecretStr
should be placed in alphabetical order with the other imports.
- Ensure that the new import statement for
-
- Consider refactoring the logic for handling the
json_format
flag into a separate method to adhere to the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
- Consider refactoring the logic for handling the
-
- Consider adding a logging statement before yielding unexpected exceptions for better debugging.
-
- Log exception details in the catch-all
except Exception as e
block to aid in debugging.
- Log exception details in the catch-all
-
- Provide more context about the error when yielding, such as the input parameters that led to the error.
-
- When creating a dictionary from
input_data.headers
, consider usinginput_data.headers.copy()
instead ofdict(input_data.headers)
to maintain the original dictionary's type if it is a subclass ofdict
.
- When creating a dictionary from
-
- Ensure that the use of
yield
in therun
method is intended and that the calling code handles the generator appropriately.
- Ensure that the use of
-
- Ensure that there is a single blank line between method definitions and class definitions for better separation.
-
- Ensure that
input_data.authorization
is notNone
before accessing its methods.
- Ensure that
-
- Consider implementing limits on the size of the response that can be processed to avoid high memory usage with large responses.
As part of my research, I'm trying to understand how useful these comments are in real-world development. If you have a moment, I'd be super grateful if you could quickly reply to these two yes/no questions:
- Does this comment provide suggestions from a dimension you hadn’t considered?
-
- Do you find this comment helpful?
Thanks a lot for your time and feedback! And sorry again if this message is a bother.
Summary
Testing
poetry run format
poetry run test
(fails: FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'docker')