Skip to content

Restructure pipeline configs to improve discoverability #854

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

edmundmiller
Copy link
Contributor

@edmundmiller edmundmiller commented Mar 5, 2025

I think restructuring the configs across the board like this would make it easier for new maintainers to find configs for pipeline for their institutions.

@edmundmiller edmundmiller self-assigned this Mar 5, 2025
@lpantano
Copy link

lpantano commented Mar 5, 2025

I support this! At least for me is easy to see now.

@jfy133
Copy link
Member

jfy133 commented Mar 5, 2025

This might be a good Hackathon task thinking about it (just moving stuff around), but we would need to coordinate with @mashehu as will need to update how the website parses this repo

@mashehu
Copy link
Contributor

mashehu commented Mar 5, 2025

Yep, please don't move anything without updating the website at the same time. My hope is that surfacing them on the website with the latest website upgrade should solve already a lot of the discoverability.

@mahesh-panchal
Copy link
Member

Can I get an overview of what you're doing that improves discoverability?

Each config and related material (docs, pipeline) is put in a folder with the profile name?
I think that's better. It'll allow better dynamic inclusion too.

I think the README should be right next to the config.

What other discoverability issues are there?

  • Key words? Hostnames?
  • What the config supports in plain language?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants