Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to ggshield 1.37.0 #138

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

Conversation

agateau-gg
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@agateau-gg agateau-gg requested a review from a team as a code owner March 3, 2025 10:26
@agateau-gg agateau-gg requested a review from salome-voltz March 3, 2025 10:26
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 3, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.73%. Comparing base (f729f8a) to head (12987db).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #138   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.73%   95.73%           
=======================================
  Files           5        5           
  Lines        1196     1196           
=======================================
  Hits         1145     1145           
  Misses         51       51           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 95.73% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sevbch sevbch added the skip-changelog No changelog check in the CI label Mar 3, 2025
@agateau-gg agateau-gg merged commit 1e66c8f into master Mar 5, 2025
19 of 20 checks passed
@agateau-gg agateau-gg deleted the agateau/update-ggshield-version branch March 5, 2025 08:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-changelog No changelog check in the CI
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants