Issue 20804: Add java nullability annotations

[nvervelle]

Motivations:
Have generated clients annotated for nullability to be able to check code using them with tools like NullAway (to close #20804)

Modifications:

• First commit :
  • Adapt api templates to use the nullability template
  • Adapt tests
• Second commit :
  • Modifications from export_docs_generators.sh

PR checklist

• Read the contribution guidelines.
• Pull Request title clearly describes the work in the pull request and Pull Request description provides details about how to validate the work. Missing information here may result in delayed response from the community.
• Run the following to build the project and update samples:

  ./mvnw clean package || exit
  ./bin/generate-samples.sh ./bin/configs/*.yaml || exit
  ./bin/utils/export_docs_generators.sh || exit
  

  (For Windows users, please run the script in Git BASH)
  Commit all changed files.
  This is important, as CI jobs will verify all generator outputs of your HEAD commit as it would merge with master.
  These must match the expectations made by your contribution.
  You may regenerate an individual generator by passing the relevant config(s) as an argument to the script, for example ./bin/generate-samples.sh bin/configs/java*.
  IMPORTANT: Do NOT purge/delete any folders/files (e.g. tests) when regenerating the samples as manually written tests may be removed.
• File the PR against the correct branch: master (upcoming 7.x.0 minor release - breaking changes with fallbacks), 8.0.x (breaking changes without fallbacks)
• If your PR is targeting a particular programming language, @mention the technical committee members, so they are more likely to review the pull request (Java: @bbdouglas, @sreeshas, @jfiala, @lukoyanov, @cbornet, @jeff9finger, @karismann, @Zomzog, @lwlee2608, @martin-mfg).

[martin-mfg]

Hi @nvervelle, thanks for the PR! I have only one tiny little remark - please see below.

[martin-mfg]

This assertion is anyway covered by the line below, right?

[nvervelle]

Hi @martin-mfg, yes, this was temporary test code to find more easily what annotations were used in each case because TestUtils.assertFileContains() doesn't output the file contents if it fails.

It's fixed.

[nvervelle]

Hi @wing328 : is the PR ok for you and can it be merged ?