-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ci and fix linux tests #8
Conversation
.github/main.workflow
Outdated
|
||
action "Test" { | ||
needs = "Dependencies" | ||
uses = "actions/npm@v2.0.0" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to test this on win, linux and mac.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Switched to azp for now to address this. I don't think I can grant azp access though since I'm not an admin of this repo.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you are admin now
I think we should look into how close we are to being able to use Dreamlifter Actions on this repo—would be a great opportunity for dog-fooding. |
I don't think we're there yet, but I agree as soon as that's possible we should do that. This is just to fill in until that point. |
I think I'm with @jclem on this one. I was on my run (where most ideas come from :) ) and I thought we could still use the dreamlifter yaml lang. We just need to flip on the feature flag in ring 0 (actually I think it's on). Chat with Eric Also, if we could get this action on the graph somehow, we could self host and test this action with this action :) Let's chat with Eric when I get in |
CI is up and running. Everything worked except for macOS which has a somewhat cryptic error inside one of the node modules - I think we should merge here and address that seperately. The node_module with the error was a Also, please ignore the mess of commits it took to get here, it took me a little bit to get the hang of the new syntax 😳 |
Everything is passing now, I'd be in favor of merging at this point. |
add account switch key internal parameter
No description provided.