Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

set workflow.ref provenance field from ref claim #1969

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

bdehamer
Copy link
Contributor

@bdehamer bdehamer commented Feb 26, 2025

Updates the buildSLSAProvenancePredicate function in the @actions/attest package to populate the workflow.ref field from the ref claim in the OIDC token.

For most events which trigger a workflow run (push, release, workflow_dispatch, etc) this will have no impact on generated predicate statement. For other events which may be triggered from ref-less commits, this will ensure that the populated value more accurately reflects the state of the workflow run.

Updates the `buildSLSAProvenancePredicate` function to populate the
`workflow.ref` field from the `ref` claim in the OIDC token.

Signed-off-by: Brian DeHamer <bdehamer@github.com>
@bdehamer bdehamer force-pushed the bdehamer/workflow-ref branch from c59c9d5 to 0bc338a Compare February 26, 2025 16:47
@bdehamer bdehamer marked this pull request as ready for review February 26, 2025 16:48
@bdehamer bdehamer requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2025 16:48
Comment on lines -78 to -87

it('handle tags including "@" character', async () => {
nock.cleanAll()
await mockIssuer({
...claims,
workflow_ref: 'owner/repo/.github/workflows/main.yml@foo@1.0.0'
})
const predicate = await buildSLSAProvenancePredicate()
expect(predicate).toMatchSnapshot()
})
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test was specifically handling the scenario where the ref was parsed from the workflow_ref claim and is no longer necessary since we no longer need to extract this value.

Copy link

@ejahnGithub ejahnGithub left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants