sam build
produces artifacts that are built for production use. In some langauges (usually interpreted),
these production artifacts are also debuggable locally. In the case of compiled languages, you usually need to compile
the binary or artifact in a specific manner for them to be debuggable.
We will introduce a way in sam build
to produce these debuggable artifacts for those compiled languages.
- Artifacts generated will be debuggable for runtimes DotNet 6.0 and above.
- Other languages
sam build
supports will not be changed
Explain the changes to command line interface, including adding new commands, modifying arguments etc
Changes are additive and will not break any existing functionality.
We have a couple options to consider:
- A command line option (
--mode
)- Pros
- Customer can control what kind of artifacts are produced.
- There is no guessing needed by the CLI
- Cons
- Yet another option for customers to learn or know about
- Makes the customer need to think about the artifacts they need to produce (though this can be hidden behind the AWS Toolkit in IDEs)
- Customers running in the command line need to remember what artifacts to produce or what they previously produced
- Pros
- An Environment Variable we read (
SAM_BUILD_MODE
). IDE Toolkit will set the env var when callingsam build
while debugging.- Pros
- Reduces cognitive load on customers that don't care about debugging dotnet apps through command line.
- Could force customers to use AWS Toolkit by default
- Cons
- Building debug artifacts becomes a hidden feature (silent contract)
- Environment Variables tend to be more set and forget.
- Need to conditionally add Env Var instead of a more convenient flag
- Pros
- Seamless Integration:
sam build
produces debug artifacts by default andsam package
will build non debug artifacts by default- Pros
- Customers should never have to think about 'when to produce debug artifacts' or forget to add a flag
- Cons
- Requires additional work on package to auto build.
- Breaks what is produced from
sam build
as build is positioned to produce artifacts that are ready for deployment
- Pros
My recommendation is to follow Option #2 from above, mainly because:
- Seamless Integration (#3) is best experience but is large in scope.
- CLI Option (#1) exposes a flag for what we think will be a rarely used CLI feature. We think so because manually setting up debugging is cumbersome. Given that .NET developers generally prefer to be within the IDE, I find it hard to believe someone will want to go out of the way of setting it up through CLI.
- Not a one-way-door. We can always add a CLI option to pair with env var later.
Explain the new configuration entries, if any, you want to add to .samrc
Tip: How does this change impact security? Answer the following questions to help answer this question better:
What new dependencies (libraries/cli) does this change require? No
What other Docker container images are you using? N/A
Are you creating a new HTTP endpoint? If so explain how it will be created & used No
Are you connecting to a remote API? If so explain how is this connection secured No
Are you reading/writing to a temporary folder? If so, what is this used for and when do you clean up? No
How do you validate new .samrc configuration? N/A
- Send a Pull Request with this design document
- Build the command line interface
- Build the underlying library
- Unit tests
- Functional Tests
- Integration tests
- Run all tests on Windows
- Update documentation