Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: go back to AL2 image in tf integ tests #7917

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

valerena
Copy link
Contributor

@valerena valerena commented Mar 5, 2025

We tried to move to an AL2023 image for an Image function on Terraform tests, when updating to Python 3.9, but the AppVeyor environment had some problems. So let's go back to the AL2 base image and install Python 3.9 in a different way.

Which issue(s) does this change fix?

Why is this change necessary?

  • AL2023 image had some network issues in AppVeyor environment, so we prefer to continue using AL2 image.

How does it address the issue?

What side effects does this change have?

Mandatory Checklist

PRs will only be reviewed after checklist is complete

  • Add input/output type hints to new functions/methods
  • Write design document if needed (Do I need to write a design document?)
  • Write/update unit tests
  • Write/update integration tests
  • Write/update functional tests if needed
  • make pr passes
  • make update-reproducible-reqs if dependencies were changed
  • Write documentation

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

We tried to move to an AL2023 image for an Image function on
Terraform tests, when updating to Python 3.9, but the AppVeyor
environment had some problems. So let's go back to the AL2 base
image and install Python 3.9 in a different way.
@valerena valerena requested a review from a team as a code owner March 5, 2025 06:14
@valerena valerena enabled auto-merge March 5, 2025 18:11
@valerena valerena added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 5, 2025
Merged via the queue into aws:develop with commit 8d17fbd Mar 5, 2025
50 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants