Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ONPREM-1919] Use go-licenses for Go license attributions #137

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

christian-stephen
Copy link
Member

@christian-stephen christian-stephen commented Mar 4, 2025

⚙️ Issue

https://circleci.atlassian.net/browse/ONPREM-1919


⚙️ Change Description

We're moving away from Snyk in the long term. In addition, Snyk would often be unable to detect the licenses for certain packages consistently.

Acceptance Criteria:


Solution


Testing

  • Created and updated tests where applicable

📖 Documentation Updates

  • Updated related documentation, if applicable
  • Updated changelog

@christian-stephen christian-stephen force-pushed the ONPREM-1919/go-licenses branch 5 times, most recently from 8739b66 to f545a4f Compare March 4, 2025 12:59
@christian-stephen christian-stephen marked this pull request as ready for review March 4, 2025 13:01
@christian-stephen christian-stephen requested a review from a team as a code owner March 4, 2025 13:01
@christian-stephen christian-stephen force-pushed the ONPREM-1919/go-licenses branch from f545a4f to 5846de8 Compare March 4, 2025 13:19
We're moving away from Snyk in the long term. In addition, Snyk would often be unable to detect the licenses for certain packages consistently.
@christian-stephen christian-stephen force-pushed the ONPREM-1919/go-licenses branch from 5846de8 to 88110d7 Compare March 4, 2025 13:22
@christian-stephen christian-stephen merged commit 90be806 into main Mar 4, 2025
8 checks passed
@christian-stephen christian-stephen deleted the ONPREM-1919/go-licenses branch March 4, 2025 13:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants