move sync_repos_languages task to get_repo_provider_service wrapper

[matt-codecov]

depends on: #1107
part of: codecov/engineering-team#3389

Legal Boilerplate

Look, I get it. The entity doing business as "Sentry" was incorporated in the State of Delaware in 2015 as Functional Software, Inc. In 2022 this entity acquired Codecov and as result Sentry is going to need some rights from me in order to utilize my contributions in this PR. So here's the deal: I retain all rights, title and interest in and to my contributions, and by keeping this boilerplate intact I confirm that Sentry can use, modify, copy, and redistribute my contributions, under Sentry's choice of terms.

[codecov-notifications]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.47619% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tasks/sync_repo_languages.py	88.23%	2 Missing ⚠️

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.47619% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 97.25%. Comparing base (afc0de3) to head (6ef1e94).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
tasks/sync_repo_languages.py	88.23%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1109   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   97.25%   97.25%           
=======================================
  Files         454      454           
  Lines       37394    37394           
=======================================
+ Hits        36367    36368    +1     
+ Misses       1027     1026    -1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	43.08% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	⬇️
unit	89.80% <90.47%> (+<0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[Swatinem]

lgtm, though at least cleaning up the duplicated logs would be nice

[Swatinem]

both of these are now covered by the LogContext, so I would not duplicate them here.

[Swatinem]

I can remember that I may have created "yet another" wrapper that takes care of this installation_name_to_use, and introduces a cache for these things.
Or I tried and failed because these things are not cache-able.