Pattern: Missing use of explicit -n
to check for output
Issue: -
[ "$(mycommand)" ]
is equivalent to [ -n "$(mycommand)" ]
and checks whether the command's output on stdout was non-empty.
Users more familiar with other languages are often surprised to learn that it is nothing like e.g. if (myfunction())
, since it does not care about what the command/function return
s.
Using an explicit -n
helps clarify that this is purely a string operation. And of course, if the intention was to check whether the command ran successfully, now would be a good time to fix it as in the alternate example.
Example of incorrect code:
if [ "$(mycommand --myflags)" ]
then
echo "True"
fi
Example of correct code:
# Check that the command outputs something on stdout
if [ -n "$(mycommand --myflags)" ]
then
echo "The command had output on stdout"
fi
# Check instead that the command succeeded (exit code = 0)
if mycommand --myflags
then
echo "The command reported success"
fi
If you are familiar with the semantics of [
, you can ignore this suggestion.