You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In #1150 we have implemented an aggregate status check (#959) for digger digger/plan and digger/apply. Although those are set correctly there is an additional mergability check which causes digger apply step to fail IF the PR is not mergable.
This has introduced chicken-egg situation where you want digger/apply check to succeed for PR to be mergable but digger/apply needs to complete
We should do an additional check on mergability where if PR state is "blocked" and the only check blocking it is "digger/apply" then to still proceed with the apply
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ZIJ
changed the title
digger apply mergability check should not fail if the "digger/apply" status check is the only thing blocking
Apply mergability check should not fail if the "digger/apply" status check is the only thing blocking
Feb 22, 2024
What's the current workaround for this in terms of ensuring that digger apply has run before a PR is merged? It seems as though it is feasible for changes to not be applied before merge with human error.
In #1150 we have implemented an aggregate status check (#959) for digger
digger/plan
anddigger/apply
. Although those are set correctly there is an additional mergability check which causes digger apply step to fail IF the PR is not mergable.This has introduced chicken-egg situation where you want digger/apply check to succeed for PR to be mergable but digger/apply needs to complete
We should do an additional check on mergability where if PR state is "blocked" and the only check blocking it is "digger/apply" then to still proceed with the apply
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: