go.mod: retract v0.9.1 #363
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #363 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 50.15% 50.15%
=======================================
Files 13 13
Lines 650 650
=======================================
Hits 326 326
Misses 279 279
Partials 45 45 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
`osxkeychain` in v0.9.1 still doesn't list credentials as prior versions did. We're retracting this version too. Signed-off-by: Albin Kerouanton <albinker@gmail.com>
akerouanton
force-pushed
the
retract-v0.9.1
branch
from
988323d to
50b162c
Compare
crazy-max
approved these changes
Mar 4, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
- What I did
osxkeychainin v0.9.1 still doesn't list credentials as prior versionsdid. We're retracting this version too.