Support Http3 in scenarios where ipv6 has been disabled at the runtime level

[mastahg]

Description

Currently if you attempt to disable ipv6 via System.Net.DisableIPv6 and initiate a Http3 connection it will fail because Socket.OSSupportsIPv6 will return false.

Reproduction Steps

Disable ipv6 via System.Net.DisableIPv6
Create a http3 client with

HttpClient Client = new HttpClient()
        {
            DefaultRequestVersion = HttpVersion.Version30,
            DefaultVersionPolicy = HttpVersionPolicy.RequestVersionExact
        };

attempt to use the httpclient and it will throw an exception

Expected behavior

Http3 should work regardless of the presence of ipv6

Actual behavior

It does not work

Regression?

No response

Known Workarounds

No response

Configuration

No response

Other information

No response

[dotnet-policy-service]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

[dotnet-policy-service]

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/ncl
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

[MihaZupan]

What issues are you trying to workaround by disabling IPv6?

We're disabling MsQuic if the OS doesn't support IPv6. At the Quic layer we don't know whether that's due to the OS actually not supporting it, or due to it being disabled via the switch.

runtime/src/libraries/System.Net.Quic/src/System/Net/Quic/Internal/MsQuicApi.cs

Lines 81 to 90 in 4fb4020

	// MsQuic is using DualMode sockets and that will fail even for IPv4 if AF_INET6 is not available.
	if (!Socket.OSSupportsIPv6)
	{
	NotSupportedReason = "OS does not support dual mode sockets.";
	if (NetEventSource.Log.IsEnabled())
	{
	NetEventSource.Info(null, NotSupportedReason);
	}
	return;
	}

[mastahg]

So we recently switched to using cloudflare proxy to protect our servers, they automatically define ipv6 aaaa records which can't be disabled without an enterprise plan, they handle the ipv6->ipv4 conversion which works fine for most users.
Some users however report issues where it seems like their ISP or their router has half-baked ipv6 support. For these users ipv6 is utterly broken, from having extreme timeouts or just being unable to reach the servers. I've had several users ping our services at the os the level and when ipv6 is enabled they'll be unable to contact the cloudflare edge servers. Having them disable ipv6 systemwide resolves the issue.

Disabling ipv6 for my application seems to make the most sense, I was doing this via the System.Net.DisableIPv6 flag, and as you indicated this disables msquic. There is no way to handle this at the application layer when using http3 as the httpclient lacks a callback handler, as tracked in issue #64449

[antonfirsov]

For these users ipv6 is utterly broken

@mastahg I'm afraid this could mean that msquic (the underlying quic lib) is also doomed to fail given that it uses dual-mode (IPv6) sockets even for IPv4.

ipv6 aaaa records

One possible way to enforce the usage of the IPv4 endpoints (and see if it helps) would be to use an IP address directly in the Uri (while setting the host header).

[mastahg]

For these users ipv6 is utterly broken

@mastahg I'm afraid this could mean that msquic (the underlying quic lib) is also doomed to fail given that it uses dual-mode (IPv6) sockets even for IPv4.

I'm evaluating the usage of http3 in censorship prone environments, this effects a much larger portion of my userbase and I'm weighing the pros and cons of each approach. Perhaps this issue would be better directed at the msquic repo. I'm not a expert in sockets but the requirement of dual-mode sockets seems arbitrary.

ipv6 aaaa records

One possible way to enforce the usage of the IPv4 endpoints (and see if it helps) would be to use an IP address directly in the Uri (while setting the host header).

I'll investigate this approach.

[rzikm]

this is related to #75343 and (microsoft/msquic#3052). I don't remember from top of my head if there were other reasons than these for checking for IPv6 availability.

[ManickaP]

Perhaps this issue would be better directed at the msquic repo.

I 100% recommend this. Please do file the issue with MsQuic.

For context, this was changed in #87208.

[ManickaP]

Either way, there isn't much we can do about this on .NET level atm.

[wfurt]

Either way, there isn't much we can do about this on .NET level atm.

documentation ??? (unless it is already there) While the QuicListener may be problematic, could we make the client work if DualMode socket can be created with IPv4?