Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Go: Slightly adjust some location info to match locations that are in the database #18868

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

owen-mc
Copy link
Contributor

@owen-mc owen-mc commented Feb 26, 2025

This makes locations in the Go library more consistent with other language libraries. It will also allow us to move to using Location getLocation() member predicates more, without the Location class being too complicated.

@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings February 26, 2025 12:48
@owen-mc owen-mc requested a review from a team as a code owner February 26, 2025 12:48

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Overview

This PR updates the change notes to reflect slight adjustments to location information in the Go library, aligning it with the location data in the database.

  • Updated change notes for several classes.
  • Adjusted location details to simplify the usage of Location getLocation() predicates.

Reviewed Changes

File Description
go/ql/lib/change-notes/2025-02-26-location-info-changed.md Updated change notes with adjusted location information

Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more

@owen-mc owen-mc merged commit 91dd9f5 into github:main Feb 26, 2025
14 checks passed
@owen-mc owen-mc deleted the go/use-more-db-locations branch February 26, 2025 16:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants