Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Go: Refactor Location implementation #18879

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hvitved
Copy link
Contributor

@hvitved hvitved commented Feb 27, 2025

Remove some code duplication.

Extracted from #18805.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Go label Feb 27, 2025
@hvitved hvitved force-pushed the go/location-refactor branch from 7c3a6f8 to 0a04885 Compare February 27, 2025 08:55
@hvitved hvitved added the no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note label Feb 27, 2025
@hvitved hvitved marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2025 12:40
@Copilot Copilot bot review requested due to automatic review settings February 27, 2025 12:40
@hvitved hvitved requested a review from a team as a code owner February 27, 2025 12:40

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

Tip: If you use Visual Studio Code, you can request a review from Copilot before you push from the "Source Control" tab. Learn more

@owen-mc
Copy link
Contributor

owen-mc commented Feb 27, 2025

Note that this conflicts with #18883.

@hvitved
Copy link
Contributor Author

hvitved commented Feb 27, 2025

Note that this conflicts with #18883.

Oh, I didn't realize that you were also going to change the locations of data flow nodes. I'll close this PR then.

@hvitved hvitved closed this Feb 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Go no-change-note-required This PR does not need a change note
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants