Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Development: Bump Jinja to 3.1.6 #10449

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025
Merged

Development: Bump Jinja to 3.1.6 #10449

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 9, 2025

Conversation

MaximilianAnzinger
Copy link
Collaborator

@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger commented Mar 6, 2025

This pull request includes a small change to the docs/requirements.txt file. The change updates the Jinja2 library from version 3.1.5 to 3.1.6. This version bump is necessary due to security vulnerabilities.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Upgraded a key dependency to ensure continued compatibility, improved performance, and a stable system environment.
    • These backend improvements support a smoother experience and reinforce overall system integrity without impacting your day-to-day usage.

@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger requested a review from a team as a code owner March 6, 2025 19:22
@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger added the security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability label Mar 6, 2025
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 6, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the Jinja2 package version in the documentation requirements file. The version in docs/requirements.txt has been incremented from 3.1.5 to 3.1.6. No other modifications were made to the file.

Changes

File Change Summary
docs/requirements.txt Updated Jinja2 version from 3.1.5 to 3.1.6

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 93eba08 and c29468a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs/requirements.txt (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/requirements.txt
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
  • GitHub Check: Mend Security Check

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@MaximilianAnzinger MaximilianAnzinger added this to the 8.0 milestone Mar 7, 2025
@krusche krusche merged commit d4288e3 into develop Mar 9, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
@krusche krusche deleted the chore/bump-jinja branch March 9, 2025 07:33
krusche pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation security Pull requests that address a security vulnerability
Projects
Status: Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants