WinGet Code Handling Modifications

[mrixner]

• I have read the contributing guidelines, and I agree with the Code of Conduct.
• Have you checked that there aren't other open pull requests for the same changes?
• Have you tested that the committed code can be executed without errors?
• This PR is not composed of garbage changes used to farm GitHub activity to enter potential Crypto AirDrops.
  Any user suspected of farming GitHub activity with crypto purposes will get banned. Submitting broken code wastes the contributors' time, who have to spend their free time reviewing, fixing, and testing code that does not even compile breaks other features, or does not introduce any useful changes. I appreciate your understanding.

---

Includes:

• a random commit from last month that I forgot to PR that marks an uninstall that returns "no applicable version found" as successful (as in the user's eyes, it should be successful - unless you want this to mark an error condition?)
• ignore the updates for a version if that program version has "no applicable update found" (note that this will likely eventually require a uninstall and reinstall of the program).

---

Should close #3326

[marticliment]

Tests are failing.

Also, when adding the package to ignored updates, I would return OperationStatus.Success, since, in this situation, the user has already told to UniGetUI to deal with this types of situations, so I don't think would be needed anymore to throw the eror, but then let the update disappear on the next reload..

[mrixner]

Tests are failing.

Sorry, I made the update via GitHub UI and couldn't imagine how it wouldn't have worked, given that it was a very simple change to code that worked before - I forgot you updated the version system! (the merge broke the tests)

Also, when adding the package to ignored updates, I would return OperationStatus.Success, since, in this situation, the user has already told to UniGetUI to deal with this types of situations, so I don't think would be needed anymore to throw the eror, but then let the update disappear on the next reload..

👍🏻
I agree, it's much better to have this behind a setting.

[marticliment]

Great, I will test and merge as soon as I can