Fix for Issue 61081 #61221
Fix for Issue 61081 #61221
Conversation
typescript-bot
added
the
For Uncommitted Bug
|
This PR doesn't have any linked issues. Please open an issue that references this PR. From there we can discuss and prioritise. |
typescript-bot
added
For Backlog Bug
@microsoft-github-policy-service agree |
|
@typescript-bot I saw that CI/ format check failed. I just formatted the file locally and I can push it up and add it to the pull request after the request has been reviewed. |
|
FWIW you do not need tests for this kind of change; it's honestly worse to write tests for these comments because updating them later will mean having to update tests to just copy the same text a second time. |
|
Thanks @jakebailey, I understand. I can take out my 2 tests if necessary. Also, I just pushed up 3 baseline/reference test files that had failed after reformatting. |
src/lib/es5.d.ts
Outdated
| * @param deleteCount The number of elements to remove. | ||
| * @param deleteCount The number of elements to remove. Omitting this argument will remove all elements from the start | ||
| * paramater location to end of the array. If value of this argument is either a negative number, zero, undefined, or a type | ||
| * that cannot be coverted to an integer, the function will evaluate the argument as zero and not remove any elements. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @birgersp, yes it is a typo. I just fixed it and pushed it up.
src/lib/es5.d.ts
Outdated
| * @param deleteCount The number of elements to remove. If value of this argument is either a negative number, zero, | ||
| * undefined, or a type that cannot be coverted to an integer, the function will evaluate the argument as zero and | ||
| * not remove any elements. | ||
| * Note: If the deleteCount argument is left empty between the start and items arguments, it will not be evaluated as |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
what does "left empty" mean, specifically?
if you mean "omitted" then that's not really valid, because the compiler will throw an error; "No overload matches this call". IMO this note can be removed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@birgersp, yes I meant omitted. I just took out that sentence (that started with "Note") and pushed it up in the latest commit.
Fixes #61081