Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Add note recommending PythonCodeExecutionTool as an alternative to CodeExecutorAgent #5809

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 4, 2025

Conversation

ekzhu
Copy link
Collaborator

@ekzhu ekzhu commented Mar 4, 2025

Resolves #5782

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.35%. Comparing base (3855989) to head (55d87e9).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5809   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   75.35%   75.35%           
=======================================
  Files         177      177           
  Lines       11421    11421           
=======================================
  Hits         8606     8606           
  Misses       2815     2815           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 75.35% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rysweet rysweet enabled auto-merge (squash) March 4, 2025 17:37
@rysweet rysweet merged commit 39bfa35 into main Mar 4, 2025
52 checks passed
@rysweet rysweet deleted the ekzhu-update-code-executor-doc branch March 4, 2025 17:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Doc update to code executor agent to mention PythonCodeExecutionTool
3 participants