Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(react-menu): Improving user experience by fixing a hoverDelay + click race condition on MenuTrigger #31124

Open
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

stevencomsft
Copy link
Contributor

@stevencomsft stevencomsft commented Apr 19, 2024

Fixing issue where menu item trigger click could have race condition with hover open and cause the menu to close immediately right as it is opening.

Previous Behavior

With a hover delay set on Menu (default is 500ms), a user can encounter (frequently) a race condition where they start to hover a menu trigger, which sets a timeout of 500ms that starts to open the popover after the delay. In a lot of scenarios, our users wait between 500-700ms to click because they think the hover might not happen, but this causes a race condition where the popover gets set to open right as they click, and then the click ends up closing the popover instantly, which is not what the user expects. Logically this makes sense, but feels like a bug to our users.

CurrMenuHoverClickRace.mp4

New Behavior

Prevent click-closing the menu while the hover open animation is occurring (after the initial delay). This allows users to click the menu trigger while it has just started opening, before human reaction speed is able to tell the popover hover open has occurred. This feels more natural to the end user.

NewMenuHoverClickRace.mp4

Copy link

codesandbox-ci bot commented Apr 19, 2024

This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox.

To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA.

@stevencomsft stevencomsft marked this pull request as ready for review April 19, 2024 21:12
@stevencomsft stevencomsft requested a review from a team as a code owner April 19, 2024 21:12
@stevencomsft
Copy link
Contributor Author

stevencomsft commented Apr 23, 2024

@ling1726 I hear you have a lot of experience with Menu - was hoping to get your review/opinion on this change :)

Wondering your thoughts on having this ~200ms delay padding for the popover animation hardcoded and possibly out of sync with the actual animation.

basically the idea here is that the default 500ms delay for hover is long enough that we see a lot of users click just after the 500ms, between that delay and when the popover is mostly done animating, due to slow reaction times. So we have a lot of examples of users clicking between 500ms and 900ms after hovering and that causes the popover to immediately close, so ideally we would want to make this a better experience by preventing the click from overriding the hover open before the human brain is able to see and process the popover is actually opening

Copy link
Member

@ling1726 ling1726 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please provide some repro steps to this in the PR description?

I don't quite understand the root cause of the problem

which sets the internal open state of the menu to open without showing the menu as open visually for 500ms

This statement is incorrect, when the user hovers over a trigger, the open state is not changed immediately, the update happens in a timeout

if (e.type === 'mouseleave' || e.type === 'mouseenter' || e.type === 'mousemove' || e.type === MENU_ENTER_EVENT) {
if (state.triggerRef.current?.contains(e.target as HTMLElement)) {
enteringTriggerRef.current = e.type === 'mouseenter' || e.type === 'mousemove';
}
// FIXME leaking Node timeout type
// eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/ban-ts-comment
// @ts-ignore
setOpenTimeout.current = setTimeout(() => trySetOpen(e, data), state.hoverDelay);
} else {
trySetOpen(e, data);
}

@stevencomsft
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ling1726 I made some changes after going back through the logic you quoted and missed that originally. updated the comments, description, and added some screen recordings :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants