We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Steps to Reproduce:
select 0 [col_a], 0 [col_b], 0 [col_c], 'a' [col_d] UNION select 0 , 0 , 99, 'a' UNION select 0 , 1 , null, 'b' UNION select 1 , 0 , 98, 'b' UNION select 1 , 1 , 97, 'a' UNION select 1 , 0 , null, 'a' UNION select 1 , 1 , 96, 'b'
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @jonp0 we made some updates to the query filtering experience in version 1.29. Can you please give it a try to see if this fixes your issue?
Sorry, something went wrong.
Hi @cssuh , Upon initial testing with the same query above (and a few others), it looks like this specific issue is fixed in 1.29.0. Thanks!
@jonp0 , thanks for the quick reply. I'll close this issue since it's fixed.
No branches or pull requests
Steps to Reproduce:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: