Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tools: switch back to official OpenSSL #57301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

Conversation

richardlau
Copy link
Member

Change tools/dep_updaters/update-openssl.sh to fetch updates from
official OpenSSL.

Refs: #57142


I was intending to test this in https://github.com/nodejs/node-auto-test but ran into some sort of branch protection rule that prevented me from pushing to main there.

I'll open another draft PR with the results of running the update script locally so we can test CI with the resultant replaced deps/openssl.

Change `tools/dep_updaters/update-openssl.sh` to fetch updates from
official OpenSSL.
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/security-wg

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory. label Mar 3, 2025
@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

I'll open another draft PR with the results of running the update script locally so we can test CI with the resultant replaced deps/openssl.

Draft PR (I've started a CI on it): #57302

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

As an aside, FWIW now that #57225 has landed, I'm planning on adding node-test-commit-linux-quic to the regular CI for pull requests to ensure we don't regress the (non-default) quic support. I'll wait a few days to allow PR's to pick up the #57225 fix.

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 3, 2025

Do you have a timeline on when we will be able to start early test builds with OpenSSL 3.5?

@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Mar 3, 2025

As an aside, FWIW now that #57225 has landed, I'm planning on adding node-test-commit-linux-quic to the regular CI for pull requests to ensure we don't regress the (non-default) quic support. I'll wait a few days to allow PR's to pick up the #57225 fix.

On this, the QUIC implementation will be updated to rely entirely on either the OpenSSL 3.5 APIs or the BoringSSL APIs (for Electron), assuming the current implementation can be made to work with the new 3.5 APIs at all. In the next week or two I plan on switching the current implementation away from quictls and onto the version of BoringSSL used by electron.

Mentioning this because I don't want you to waste effort trying to preserve anything with quictls.

@richardlau
Copy link
Member Author

Do you have a timeline on when we will be able to start early test builds with OpenSSL 3.5?

I posted an update with the OpenSSL 3.5 roadmap in #57281 (comment). An alpha release is scheduled for next week (11 March) and I can aim to have something in the CI (Node.js built against a shared OpenSSL) with that (and the beta when that is out).

Mentioning this because I don't want you to waste effort trying to preserve anything with quictls.

Okay thanks, that helps. I'll not bother with node-test-commit-linux-quic then.

@richardlau richardlau added the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 4, 2025
Copy link
Member

@mhdawson mhdawson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Mar 5, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 2bf0bd2 into main Mar 5, 2025
26 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 2bf0bd2

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
tools Issues and PRs related to the tools directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants