Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add node-gyp config, fix npm-version config warning #8129

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 7, 2025

Conversation

wraithgar
Copy link
Member

@wraithgar wraithgar commented Feb 24, 2025

This formalizes the node-gyp config that is eventually consumed by @npmcli/run-script.

We will want to land this update in @npmcli/run-script and include it here.

This also warns when npm-version is being set by the user.

@wraithgar

This comment was marked as outdated.

@wraithgar wraithgar marked this pull request as draft February 24, 2025 22:09
@wraithgar wraithgar force-pushed the gar/node-gyp-config branch 4 times, most recently from fa27659 to 1fdd854 Compare March 3, 2025 19:04
@wraithgar wraithgar marked this pull request as ready for review March 3, 2025 19:08
@wraithgar wraithgar changed the title feat: add node-gyp config add node-gyp config, fix npm-version config warning Mar 5, 2025
@wraithgar wraithgar force-pushed the gar/node-gyp-config branch from 1fdd854 to a513338 Compare March 5, 2025 17:54
This formalizes the `node-gyp` config that is eventually consumed by [@npmcli/run-script](npm.im/@npmcli/run-script).

That module will need to be updated so that it can accept this config and use it if found, only falling back to its current behavior by default.
reggi
reggi previously approved these changes Mar 6, 2025
@wraithgar wraithgar merged commit 679bc4a into latest Mar 7, 2025
33 checks passed
@wraithgar wraithgar deleted the gar/node-gyp-config branch March 7, 2025 17:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants