-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 351
Issues: python-trio/trio
Backwards-incompatible changes - SUBSCRIBE TO THIS THREAD if ...
#1
opened Jan 22, 2017 by
njsmith
Open
13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
Nasty edge case in async generator shutdown: can't tell what order to close them in
#2081
opened Jul 26, 2021 by
njsmith
2 tasks
Build our own file I/O API
design discussion
potential API breaker
#1960
opened Apr 14, 2021 by
njsmith
We need a mechanism to crash Trio with a given exception; how should it work?
exception handling
todo soon
#1607
opened Jun 10, 2020 by
njsmith
Figure out if we're using the correct clocks everywhere
low-level
#1586
opened Jun 8, 2020 by
njsmith
In run_process, what should happen if the deliver_cancel function raises an exception?
subprocesses
#1532
opened May 18, 2020 by
njsmith
Consider the behavior of nursery.start when the target nursery is cancelled
cancellation
#1431
opened Mar 10, 2020 by
njsmith
Race condition in trio.hazmat.WaitForSingleObject
low-level
Windows
#1271
opened Oct 27, 2019 by
njsmith
On windows, notify_closing should accept arbitrary handles and wake up other handle operations
low-level
Windows
#1270
opened Oct 25, 2019 by
njsmith
Replace SIGHUP example in docs with one that doesn't assume arcane Unix knowledge
docs
#1246
opened Oct 13, 2019 by
njsmith
Names for communication ABCs
communication
potential API breaker
#1208
opened Sep 13, 2019 by
njsmith
Incorporate recommendations from https://github.com/gvwilson/10-newcomers
project meta
#1187
opened Aug 14, 2019 by
njsmith
StapledStream.send_eof should error out if you call it while send_all is pending
communication
#1180
opened Aug 9, 2019 by
njsmith
Discussion: implications of macOS's new Network.framework
design discussion
low-level
potential API breaker
#1165
opened Aug 1, 2019 by
njsmith
Discussion: SSL backend
design discussion
potential API breaker
TLS
Relevant to our TLS/SSL implementation
#1145
opened Jul 10, 2019 by
njsmith
Should we replace send/receive with some other verbs?
potential API breaker
#1125
opened Jun 26, 2019 by
njsmith
Move trio.Condition into trio.hazmat, or possibly remove altogether?
design discussion
potential API breaker
#1082
opened Jun 4, 2019 by
njsmith
Previous Next
ProTip!
no:milestone will show everything without a milestone.