Tags: web-platform-tests/wpt
Tags
webrtc wpt: assert that a remote prflx usernameFragment is not expose… …d in getStats when not known via signaling WPT for https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/366562 BUG=webrtc:375571816 Change-Id: I3f61f43fc88633f8c584535f280c06122cff1742 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6330947 Reviewed-by: Guido Urdaneta <guidou@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Philipp Hancke <philipp.hancke@googlemail.com> Reviewed-by: Harald Alvestrand <hta@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1429895}
[EditContext] Deactivate EditContext earlier to prevent being impacte… …d by DispatchFocusEvent EditContext's activation is synced with the associated element being focused or not. If an element loses focus, its associated EditContext is deactivated. Before this patch, deactivate the EditContext associated with `old_focused_element` after `DispatchFocusEvent`. However, `DispatchFocusEvent` could potentially result in another change in focus, which would prevent the EditContext's from being deactivated. Bug: 375711382 Change-Id: I4fb422602faeae5145b3431aee063d367b69fbd3 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6332446 Reviewed-by: Dan Clark <daniec@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Peng Zhou <zhoupeng.1996@bytedance.com> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1429887}
Clean up leftover getInnerHTML() stuff The [1] CL removed this feature, but apparently left a few things in the codebase. This CL attempts to finish the job. [1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6028938 Bug: 41492947 Change-Id: Iea7a95787f8ea22b5f300561434701bd9162472d Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6319002 Auto-Submit: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Traian Captan <tcaptan@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Traian Captan <tcaptan@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1429841}
Make interesttarget buttons non-user-selectable This is required, in order to be able to long-press a button like this on mobile platforms. Without this change, the long press highlights the word within the button that was long- pressed, which is an odd experience. See whatwg/html#8228 for a very related discussion about *all* buttons. Due to the fact that the current behavior is quite odd on mobile, I am more inclined to think we should just ship that behavior across all buttons. But for now, this just modifies interesttarget. Bug: 40860451,326681249 Change-Id: Ieb77f44ae59e63fcfbbf7c78808169b45a4ba3ac Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6319439 Reviewed-by: Di Zhang <dizhangg@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Di Zhang <dizhangg@chromium.org> Auto-Submit: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1429832}
[reading-flow] Implement source-order keyword Per CSSWG resolution [1]: - RESOLVED: Resolution to restore previous reading order property and use it as a starting point for reading order flow. - RESOLVED: as a starting point, define that if the reading order of 2 items is equivalent, reading flow breaks the tie. We add the new keyword source-order as a valid keyword for the reading-flow property. When set on a flex, grid or block layout box, it is recognized as a reading flow container that should follow DOM tree order, but that order can be overwritten by reading-order. We remove the sorting by reading-order in flex/grid algorithms added at: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6244985 Instead, this sorting happens inside the focus controller logic, once a list of reading flow elements are defined. Accessibility tree is not handled yet and will be updated in a separate patch. [1] w3c/csswg-drafts#11208 (comment) Change-Id: I0859f7675651b57bc1329bef8a23e49ed7906436 Bug: 393550130 Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/6333684 Reviewed-by: Mason Freed <masonf@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Di Zhang <dizhangg@chromium.org> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#1429811}
Test documents loaded from local schemes inherit TT CSP rules. See https://w3c.github.io/webappsec-csp/#security-inherit-csp Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D239878 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1952498 gecko-commit: 47c6b68961657a9091a30a84259e34a8056d46f7 gecko-reviewers: smaug
nsFind: Return null if boundary points are removed from the DOM tree. Differential Revision: https://phabricator.services.mozilla.com/D240494 bugzilla-url: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1949877 gecko-commit: c51bc6c076a9d418078ab86c919f56420a30d339 gecko-reviewers: emilio
Remove erroneous assertions from field-sizing-input-number.html (#51221) It's wrong to assert that a field-sizing content number input should be the same height as a fixed one.
PreviousNext