Skip to content

[Authn-4895] add section on eventual consistency of keys #30064

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Jun 26, 2025

Conversation

Alchemille
Copy link
Contributor

@Alchemille Alchemille commented Jun 23, 2025

Took inspiration from https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/developerguide/accessing-kms.html#programming-eventual-consistency

Make it more clear that the delay affects both creation and revocation

Recommend waiting and probing

@Alchemille Alchemille requested a review from a team as a code owner June 23, 2025 15:33
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jun 23, 2025

✅ Documentation Team Review

The documentation team has approved this pull request. Thank you for your contribution!

Copy link
Contributor

Preview links (active after the build_preview check completes)

Modified Files

@Alchemille Alchemille force-pushed the felicite.lordon/authn-4895-doc branch from 3aa6fc7 to fb33a8c Compare June 23, 2025 16:38
Copy link
Contributor

@jhgilbert jhgilbert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Approved, let me know if you need help merging it!

Copy link
Contributor

@anthony-dgx anthony-dgx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Alchemille Alchemille merged commit f37e8d6 into master Jun 26, 2025
15 checks passed
@Alchemille Alchemille deleted the felicite.lordon/authn-4895-doc branch June 26, 2025 20:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants