Skip to content

chore: update pre-commit hooks #400

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 27, 2025
Merged

Conversation

pre-commit-ci[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2025

Copy link
Contributor

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Templating

Version numbers are not typically covered by templating. It is expected that this PR is 100% about advancing version numbers, which would not require any templating follow-up. Please double-check for any other changes that might be suitable for templating.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jun 23, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.48%. Comparing base (ef7347a) to head (7fcc587).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #400      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.44%   97.48%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files           7        7              
  Lines         625      636      +11     
==========================================
+ Hits          609      620      +11     
  Misses         16       16              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ESadek-MO
Copy link

from @SciTools/peloton:

This precommit failure is due to a new rule included inthe latest ruff release.

We think we should still check for this rule, and only exclude on an inline case-by-case basis.

@trexfeathers
Copy link
Contributor

from @SciTools/peloton:

This precommit failure is due to a new rule included inthe latest ruff release.

We think we should still check for this rule, and only exclude on an inline case-by-case basis.

See bjlittle/geovista#1513

@bjlittle bjlittle force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from 5abe485 to 7ec1078 Compare June 26, 2025 09:40
Copy link
Contributor

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Templating

Version numbers are not typically covered by templating. It is expected that this PR is 100% about advancing version numbers, which would not require any templating follow-up. Please double-check for any other changes that might be suitable for templating.

scitools-ci[bot]
scitools-ci bot previously requested changes Jun 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@scitools-ci scitools-ci bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

pre-commit-ci bot and others added 2 commits June 27, 2025 11:51
updates:
- [github.com/pre-commit/mirrors-mypy: v1.16.0 → v1.16.1](pre-commit/mirrors-mypy@v1.16.0...v1.16.1)
- [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.11.13 → v0.12.0](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.11.13...v0.12.0)
@bjlittle bjlittle force-pushed the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch from 68fd6d7 to 7fcc587 Compare June 27, 2025 10:51
Copy link
Contributor

@stephenworsley stephenworsley left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@stephenworsley stephenworsley merged commit 7082684 into main Jun 27, 2025
15 checks passed
@stephenworsley stephenworsley deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch June 27, 2025 11:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants