Skip to content

[release/9.0-staging] Update dependencies from dotnet/xharness #116908

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: release/9.0-staging
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/xharness

…50617.3

Microsoft.DotNet.XHarness.CLI , Microsoft.DotNet.XHarness.TestRunners.Common , Microsoft.DotNet.XHarness.TestRunners.Xunit
 From Version 9.0.0-prerelease.25269.3 -> To Version 9.0.0-prerelease.25317.3
@kotlarmilos kotlarmilos added the Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review label Jun 25, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the XHarness dependencies to a newer prerelease and adjusts related configurations.

  • Bump XHarness CLI and test runner packages from 9.0.0-prerelease.25269.3 to 9.0.0-prerelease.25317.3
  • Update matching SHAs in Version.Details.xml
  • Add two new Emsdk package sources and remove an existing SDK feed in NuGet.config
  • Update the .NET tool manifest version for XHarness CLI

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File Description
eng/Versions.props Bumped XHarness package versions
eng/Version.Details.xml Updated XHarness dependency versions and SHAs
NuGet.config Added additional emsdk feeds and removed dotnet-sdk package source
.config/dotnet-tools.json Updated XHarness CLI tool version
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

NuGet.config:17

  • It looks like the dotnet-sdk package source was removed in this change, which may break restores for SDK packages. Please confirm if this deletion was intentional or re-add the source.
    <!--  End: Package sources from dotnet-sdk -->

NuGet.config Outdated
Comment on lines 13 to 14
<add key="darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb-2" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb6-2/nuget/v3/index.json" />
<add key="darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb-1" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb6-1/nuget/v3/index.json" />
Copy link
Preview

Copilot AI Jun 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[nitpick] The newly added emsdk package sources -2 and -1 could be sorted (e.g., -1 then -2) to keep the list in ascending order for consistency.

Suggested change
<add key="darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb-2" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb6-2/nuget/v3/index.json" />
<add key="darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb-1" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb6-1/nuget/v3/index.json" />
<add key="darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb-1" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb6-1/nuget/v3/index.json" />
<add key="darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb-2" value="https://pkgs.dev.azure.com/dnceng/public/_packaging/darc-pub-dotnet-emsdk-b567cdb6-2/nuget/v3/index.json" />

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.

@kotlarmilos kotlarmilos added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Jun 25, 2025
@jozkee jozkee added Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release and removed Servicing-consider Issue for next servicing release review labels Jun 30, 2025
@jozkee jozkee enabled auto-merge (squash) June 30, 2025 21:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow Servicing-approved Approved for servicing release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants