Skip to content

chore: migrate to ESLint v9 #94

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

lumirlumir
Copy link
Member

Prerequisites checklist

What is the purpose of this pull request?

Hello,

In this PR, I've migrated ESLint from v8 to v9.

I've also updated related dependencies to ensure compatibility with ESLint v9.

What changes did you make? (Give an overview)

I've bumped eslint, eslint-plugin-jsx-a11y, eslint-plugin-react-hooks, and @typescript-eslint to properly support ESLint v9.

Additionally, I've added defineConfig and globalIgnores, which were introduced recently.

Related Issues

Is there anything you'd like reviewers to focus on?

Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 26, 2025

Deploy Preview for eslint-code-explorer ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit f2564a7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/eslint-code-explorer/deploys/680c678d6a99470008b8924d
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-94--eslint-code-explorer.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@lumirlumir lumirlumir mentioned this pull request Apr 26, 2025
68 tasks
Copy link
Member

@nzakas nzakas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@nzakas nzakas merged commit fcc4b05 into eslint:main Apr 29, 2025
8 checks passed
@lumirlumir lumirlumir deleted the chore-migrate-to-eslint-v9 branch April 29, 2025 23:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants