Skip to content

[Docs][KubeRay] Update KubeRay operator installation references for all docs #53885

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

MortalHappiness
Copy link
Member

Why are these changes needed?

Follow-up PR for #53842

Related issue number

Checks

  • I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., git commit -s) in this PR.
  • I've run scripts/format.sh to lint the changes in this PR.
  • I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/.
    • I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a
      method in Tune, I've added it in doc/source/tune/api/ under the
      corresponding .rst file.
  • I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Release tests
    • This PR is not tested :(

…ll docs

Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
@MortalHappiness MortalHappiness force-pushed the docs/update-kuberay-operator-installation-link-ref branch from 0112ba5 to 241b20a Compare June 17, 2025 14:57
@MortalHappiness MortalHappiness marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2025 06:41
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings June 18, 2025 06:41
@MortalHappiness MortalHappiness requested review from pcmoritz, kevin85421 and a team as code owners June 18, 2025 06:41
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the documentation to use the new "KubeRay Operator Installation" reference for installing the KubeRay operator.

  • Updated link text in the Kubernetes user guides and the quick-start notebook for consistency.
  • Clarified instructions by replacing the old "RayCluster Quickstart" reference with the new operator installation guide.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
doc/source/cluster/kubernetes/user-guides/uv.md Updated installation link text.
doc/source/cluster/kubernetes/user-guides/kubectl-plugin.md Updated installation link text.
doc/source/cluster/kubernetes/getting-started/rayjob-quick-start.ipynb Updated installation link text.

@kevin85421 kevin85421 added the go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests label Jun 18, 2025
@MortalHappiness
Copy link
Member Author

@jjyao @edoakes could you merge this PR? Thanks!

@edoakes edoakes merged commit 4df7bcd into ray-project:master Jun 18, 2025
6 checks passed
rebel-scottlee pushed a commit to rebellions-sw/ray that referenced this pull request Jun 21, 2025
…ll docs (ray-project#53885)

Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
Signed-off-by: Scott Lee <scott.lee@rebellions.ai>
minerharry pushed a commit to minerharry/ray that referenced this pull request Jun 27, 2025
…ll docs (ray-project#53885)

Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
elliot-barn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
…ll docs (#53885)

Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
goutamvenkat-anyscale pushed a commit to goutamvenkat-anyscale/ray that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2025
…ll docs (ray-project#53885)

Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
Signed-off-by: Goutam V <goutam@anyscale.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
go add ONLY when ready to merge, run all tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants