-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
[Bugfix][v1] Fix step pooler implementation and step pooling usage in v1 #19956
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Isotr0py, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request focuses on critical bug fixes related to the step pooler implementation and its usage within the v1 runner. It resolves an issue where collected pooled data was being inadvertently discarded and ensures that necessary prompt token IDs are correctly propagated for step pooling operations, enhancing the correctness and reliability of the pooling mechanism.
Highlights
- Step Pooler Implementation Fix: Corrected a logical error in
vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler.py
where thepooled_data
list was redundantly re-initialized after being populated, ensuring that collected pooled data is no longer discarded. - V1 Runner Step Pooling Metadata: Addressed a bug in
vllm/v1/worker/gpu_input_batch.py
to ensure thatprompt_token_ids
are correctly included in the sampling metadata when step pooling is active, which was previously missing. - Conditional Prompt Token Handling: Introduced a new
is_step_pooler
flag invllm/v1/worker/gpu_model_runner.py
and propagated it to theInputBatch
constructor, allowing for conditional inclusion ofprompt_token_ids
specifically for step pooling operations.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request fixes a bug in the step pooler implementation and ensures that prompt token IDs are correctly handled when using step pooling with the v1 runner. The changes include removing a redundant assignment in the pooler, adding a flag to indicate the need for token IDs during sampling, and passing this flag to the InputBatch constructor and reinitialization methods. These changes improve the correctness and efficiency of step pooling.
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
Also cc @maxdebayser |
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the fix! Overall it looks good to me. I've only requested a few small refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Isotr0py <2037008807@qq.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks!
Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
supported_models.md
andexamples
for a new model.Purpose
pooled_data = []
in step pooler implementationprompt_token_ids
in pooling metadata for step pooling when using v1 runnerTest Plan
Test Result
(Optional) Documentation Update