Add unit tests for parsing unexpected fields/enums

[gcatanese]

Add unit tests to confirm the JSON parsing doesn't thrown an error when

• there is a new response attribute
• there is a new enum value in a response
• there is a new Terminal Event Type

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @gcatanese, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly enhances the SDK's forward compatibility and stability by introducing comprehensive unit tests. These tests ensure that the SDK's JSON deserialization logic can robustly process API responses and webhooks that may contain new, unforeseen fields or enum values, preventing runtime errors and ensuring a smoother integration experience as APIs evolve.

Highlights

• Robustness Testing: I've added new unit tests to confirm that the SDK's JSON parsing can gracefully handle unexpected fields and unknown enum values in API responses and webhooks without throwing errors.
• Mock Data Expansion: New mock response data has been introduced for Legal Entity Management, Terminal API, and Banking Webhooks to simulate scenarios with additional attributes and unknown enum values, facilitating comprehensive testing.
• API Coverage: The new tests specifically cover parsing resilience for Legal Entity Management API responses, Terminal Cloud API responses (including event notifications), and Banking Webhooks.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request adds valuable unit tests to ensure the SDK can gracefully handle unexpected attributes and enum values in API responses. The changes are well-structured and address an important aspect of SDK robustness. There are a couple of issues in the new tests where a Jest matcher was used incorrectly, which could lead to false positives.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud