-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs on Corepack need to be expanded #6728
Comments
They are not, a vote is in progress as of last week. The thread you link is a non-binding circlejerk. If Node.js decides to neuter Corepack in any way (which we'll see depending on the results of the vote) we'll take notice and act accordingly. |
The TSC voted to remove corepack in a future (25+) release:
|
I updated the getting started page, help welcome to update other references in the doc.
As for long-term plans it's a little soon to be certain what the alternative to Corepack will be, but I believe likely we'll keep the versioning mechanism while using a different implementation than Corepack. For the moment I'm focusing on the next two Yarn majors, and once this job is done we'll have more clarity as to what we need. |
The vote does not change much. The Node.js TSC decided to continue distributing Corepack with the next release of Node.js which is |
For me the barrier to using Corepack in production is that it is marked as experimental. I don't care though if I need to install it manually instead of having it delivered together with Node.js. I would need to see it declared as stable with an on-going support commitment and endorsement for use in production. https://nodejs.org/docs/latest/api/corepack.html has it in the category Experimental |
Yarn's docs on Corepack should be expanded to explain:
.yarn/releases
, etc.URL: https://yarnpkg.com/corepack
Related: #5949
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: