Fix 13288 by add Task.Delay for test ListView_Click_On_Second_Column_Does_Not_Alter_CheckBoxesAsync

[LeafShi1]

Fixes #13288

Proposed changes

• Add Task.Delay for test ListView_Click_On_Second_Column_Does_Not_Alter_CheckBoxesAsync

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 51.09826%. Comparing base (8376cfc) to head (cb9636e).
Report is 47 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (8376cfc) and HEAD (cb9636e). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (8376cfc)	HEAD (cb9636e)
Debug	3	2
test	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                  @@
##                main      #13534          +/-   ##
====================================================
- Coverage   76.59900%   51.09826%   -25.50074%     
====================================================
  Files           3230        2054        -1176     
  Lines         639165      286636      -352529     
  Branches       47297       41946        -5351     
====================================================
- Hits          489594      146466      -343128     
+ Misses        145989      137347        -8642     
+ Partials        3582        2823         -759     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Debug	51.09826% <ø> (-25.50075%)	⬇️
integration	18.87868% <ø> (+0.09402%)	⬆️
production	51.09826% <ø> (+0.09166%)	⬆️
test	?
unit	48.41855% <ø> (+0.01376%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ricardobossan]

All LGTM!

[KlausLoeffelmann]

Out of curiosity, would Application.DoEvents(); or await InvokeAsync(() => { }); also mitigate this?
(I figure await Task.Yield(); would not.)

[LeafShi1]

Out of curiosity, would Application.DoEvents(); or await InvokeAsync(() => { }); also mitigate this?

Yes, Application.DoEvents(); and await form.InvokeAsync(() => { }); also mitigate this.

[KlausLoeffelmann]

I would go for the InvokeAsync.
From my side, it's approved, so, you can approve it internally if you can, and merge it. Ping me, if you need my approval!

[KlausLoeffelmann]

Great work — 加油!