Skip to content

github: Restrict repo contents permissions to read-only in pr-validation #8414

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 26, 2025

Conversation

dfawley
Copy link
Member

@dfawley dfawley commented Jun 25, 2025

RELEASE NOTES: none

@dfawley dfawley added this to the 1.75 Release milestone Jun 25, 2025
@dfawley dfawley requested a review from arjan-bal June 25, 2025 21:05
@dfawley dfawley added the Type: Meta Github repo, process, etc label Jun 25, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 82.37%. Comparing base (6207142) to head (5069885).
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #8414      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.26%   82.37%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files         414      414              
  Lines       40424    40424              
==========================================
+ Hits        33255    33300      +45     
+ Misses       5802     5761      -41     
+ Partials     1367     1363       -4     

see 24 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@arjan-bal arjan-bal assigned dfawley and unassigned arjan-bal Jun 26, 2025
@dfawley dfawley merged commit bfc1981 into grpc:master Jun 26, 2025
16 of 19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Type: Meta Github repo, process, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants