-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6.7k
[Docs][KubeRay] Fix RayJob quickstart doc step 9 error #53887
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Docs][KubeRay] Fix RayJob quickstart doc step 9 error #53887
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR fixes an error in the RayJob quickstart documentation by updating step 9 to ignore output from deleted clusters.
- Updated notebook cell metadata to include "remove-output" and "nbval-ignore-output" tags
- Ensures the expected output (i.e., no RayClusters displayed) without affecting test coverage
Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
11b8a48
to
af4475a
Compare
"rayjob-sample-raycluster-7965c-small-group-worker-nlzwx 1/1 Running 0 117s\n", | ||
"rayjob-sample-74pmj 1/1 Running 0 2s\n" | ||
"kuberay-operator-6bc45dd644-lc45k 1/1 Running 0 81s\n", | ||
"rayjob-sample-raycluster-jbd9q-head-66cgd 1/1 Running 0 58s\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you use v1.4? In my memory, the head should not have suffix 66cgd
if you use v1.4.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is another PR to update the KubeRay version for doctests and then rerun them all. But it needs to wait for the formal release to use 1.4.0
version.
…3887) Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chi-Sheng Liu <chishengliu@chishengliu.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Why are these changes needed?
Step 9 should show no RayClusters. It shows one cluster because it is still being deleted, but we didn't wait for it.
This PR added one ignored cell, polling wait for the RayCluster being deleted.
I've already rerun the whole jupyter notebook.
Related issue number
Checks
git commit -s
) in this PR.scripts/format.sh
to lint the changes in this PR.method in Tune, I've added it in
doc/source/tune/api/
under thecorresponding
.rst
file.