Skip to content

Update RFC 2119 keyword usage #170

New issue
New issue
Closed
#171
Closed
Update RFC 2119 keyword usage#170
#171
Assignees
afs
Labels
spec:editorialMinor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
@afs

Description

@afs
afs
opened on Nov 26, 2024
Contributor

At the moment it is in explicit markup <em class="rfc2119" title="Keyword in RFC 2119 context">MUST</em> but could be simply MUST etc because ReSpec handles it.

Activity

afs
self-assigned this
on Nov 26, 2024
afs
added
spec:editorialMinor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)
on Nov 26, 2024
afs
mentioned this on Nov 26, 2024
afs
closed this as completedin #171on Nov 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

spec:editorialMinor change in the specification (markup, typo, informative text; class 1 or 2)

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

    Development

    Participants

    @afs

    Issue actions
      Update RFC 2119 keyword usage · Issue #170 · w3c/sparql-query