Skip to content

[LTS] Remove server #23674

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: lts
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

[LTS] Remove server #23674

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

Abe27342
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Removes the server from LTS. We have no plans or reason to release server from LTS, and keeping it around increases maintenance burden and makes a potential transition to pnpm (from lerna) more complex.

@Abe27342
Copy link
Contributor Author

before committing, I want to revert the change disabling coverage. However, we need to adjust the PAT used for danger GH account first as it's currently over 365 days. I'll also track getting that to a better state (convert to GH app or adopt some other means of bundle size setup, authentication-wise)

@Abe27342
Copy link
Contributor Author

There are some remaining references in the form of docs links to things in the server folder (mostly the tinylicious implementation in example packages). I didn't want to bother changing that in this PR as it's plausible those get deleted too. But highly encourage reviewer to look not only for things this PR does but also things I may have missed, as is typical with this sort of change.

Copy link
Contributor

@alexvy86 alexvy86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can't immediately think of anything else that was missed, and everything removed makes sense to me.

@@ -378,7 +378,8 @@ stages:
and(
succeeded(),
eq(variables['Build.Reason'], 'PullRequest'),
ne(variables['System.PullRequest.IsFork'], 'true')
ne(variables['System.PullRequest.IsFork'], 'true'),
false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One of your comments talks about "disabling coverage" which I thought was test coverage but I guess you meant this, right?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants