Skip to content

meta: bump actions/dependency-review-action from 4.6.0 to 4.7.1 #7807

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Jun 1, 2025

Bumps actions/dependency-review-action from 4.6.0 to 4.7.1.

Release notes

Sourced from actions/dependency-review-action's releases.

v4.7.1

  • Packages added to allow-dependencies-licenses will be allowed even if the package in question has no license information #889
  • License expressions (e.g. Ruby OR GPL-2.0) in the allow list are automatically discarded so that they don't invalidate the whole allow list, which should just be license identifier (e.g. Ruby)

v4.7.0

  • Handle complex license expressions (e.g. MIT AND GPL-2.0) in allow lists (fixes #809 and probably others)
  • Replace OTHER in package licenses with LicenseRef-clearlydefined-OTHER so that parsing passes
Commits
  • da24556 Merge pull request #933 from actions/dangoor/471-release
  • 9af0caf Bump version number for 4.7.1
  • d8f2df2 Merge pull request #932 from actions/907-disallow-expression
  • 6e9307a Discard allow list entries that are not SPDX IDs
  • 8805179 Merge pull request #930 from actions/889-allow-no-license
  • 014300b Update build
  • 34486f3 Check namespaces when excluding license checks
  • 9b155d6 Update build
  • f199659 Allowing dependencies works with no licenses
  • 38ecb5b Merge pull request #929 from actions/dangoor/4.7-release
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [actions/dependency-review-action](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action) from 4.6.0 to 4.7.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/actions/dependency-review-action/releases)
- [Commits](actions/dependency-review-action@ce3cf95...da24556)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: actions/dependency-review-action
  dependency-version: 4.7.1
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 1, 2025
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner June 1, 2025 17:11
@dependabot dependabot bot added the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 1, 2025
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 1, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Skipped Deployment
Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 1, 2025 5:11pm

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the github_actions:pull-request Trigger Pull Request Checks label Jun 1, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 1, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 75.47%. Comparing base (71be084) to head (01e300a).
Report is 18 commits behind head on main.

✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7807      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   75.48%   75.47%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         101      101              
  Lines        8309     8309              
  Branches      218      218              
==========================================
- Hits         6272     6271       -1     
- Misses       2035     2036       +1     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@MattIPv4 MattIPv4 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Improved complex license handling

@avivkeller avivkeller added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit b6edea0 Jun 4, 2025
21 of 22 checks passed
@avivkeller avivkeller deleted the dependabot/github_actions/actions/dependency-review-action-4.7.1 branch June 4, 2025 10:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants