Skip to content

Style update for easy navigation #11166

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Animati0n opened this issue Mar 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

Style update for easy navigation #11166

Animati0n opened this issue Mar 27, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
spec tooling

Comments

@Animati0n
Copy link

What problem are you trying to solve?

HTML standards style update for ease of access instead of scrolling down endlessly.

What solutions exist today?

Add side bar as table of content for ease of use.

How would you solve it?

By adding side navigation bar with ease access to appropriate docs.

Anything else?

That's it for now.
@Animati0n Animati0n added addition/proposal New features or enhancements needs implementer interest Moving the issue forward requires implementers to express interest labels Mar 27, 2025
@domenic domenic added spec tooling and removed addition/proposal New features or enhancements needs implementer interest Moving the issue forward requires implementers to express interest labels Mar 27, 2025
@Animati0n

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@Animati0n
Copy link
Author

Animati0n commented Apr 13, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Hi is it okay to re write the html-build repo in any other static site generators ?
other than "tokio" like example https://www.getzola.org/ .

Note
It will be easy to handle style and content more meaning fully. This is my suggestion though if there any good reason html-build it is as it is then it is fine.

@domenic
Copy link
Member

domenic commented Apr 14, 2025

No, it is not OK to rewrite html-build.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
spec tooling
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@domenic @Animati0n