-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
Utilize docIdRunEnd
on ReqExclBulkScorer
#14806
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
This PR does not have an entry in lucene/CHANGES.txt. Consider adding one. If the PR doesn't need a changelog entry, then add the skip-changelog label to it and you will stop receiving this reminder on future updates to the PR. |
if (exclTwoPhase == null) { | ||
// from upTo to docIdRunEnd() are excluded, so we scored up to docIdRunEnd() | ||
upTo = exclApproximation.docIDRunEnd(); | ||
} else if (exclTwoPhase.matches()) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is upTo = Math.max(upTo + 1, exclTwoPhase.docIdRunEnd())
correct here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it's correct here, and I run lucene test locally, everything looks fine. What I'm concerned here is that only DocValuesRangeIterator
implement it's own docIdRunEnd
method for now, I'm not sure whether adding this will hurt the performance or not
if (exclTwoPhase == null || exclTwoPhase.matches()) { | ||
if (exclTwoPhase == null) { | ||
// from upTo to docIdRunEnd() are excluded, so we scored up to docIdRunEnd() | ||
upTo = exclApproximation.docIDRunEnd(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to check exclApproximation.docID() != DocIdSetIterator#NO_MORE_DOCS
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If I understand correctly, exclApproximation.docID()
should equals exclDoc
, which is equal to upTo
(under the if
clause ), and upTo
is less than max
, so exclApproximation.docID()
should never be DocIdSetIterator#NO_MORE_DOCS
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh yes, You are right. Thanks for explanation!
Description
This PR propose to utilize
docIdRunEnd
onReqExclBulkScorer
, so we can jump faster onMUST_NOT
clause